Cover

The Young Turks

10 People Who Can Help Get a Project Built — Or Help Stop One


Online Only

Gingrich-Cuomo Cooper Union Debate Transcripts

Q&A with Gale Brewer

Q&A with Jessica Lappin

Editorial: Slippery Standards


News

Costs Overruns Threaten to Derail No. 7 Extension

State of the Unions: Employee Free Choice Act Raises Questions and Worries

State of the Unions: 32BJ’s Doyle to IDA

State of the Unions: Tasini to Host Edwards

Public Advocacy Project to Begin This Summer

Mixed Signals on Human Trafficking Bill

Elsewhere: Philadelphia Deals with Campaign Finance Reform


Features

On/Off the Record: Bill Thompson on Buildings, Brickbats and Breakfast

CHatter

Back in the District: Serphin Maltese

Battles of the Branches

Pundit Poll: New York Presidential Showdown

Where Are They Now? Claire Shulman


Editorial/Op-Ed

Editorial: Back in the USSR (Upper East Side Soviet Republic)

The View from Albany: Prescription for the Presidency by Alan Chartock

Legislature Should Join Spitzer in Support of Full Public Financing by Richard Kirsch

EDITORIAL

Slippery Standards

When Hillary Clinton and Robert Kennedy moved to New York for the express purpose of running for Senate, they did it legally. They took their races and the office they were seeking seriously enough to make the move within all legal parameters.

Not so for Dr. Mathieu Eugene, whose 1000+ votes made him the winner of the Feb. 20 special election to fill Yvette Clarke’s old Council seat, but whose residency that day made him ineligible to take it.

As Eugene proved by asking the mayor to call yet another special election (forcing the city to pony up more cash for his selfish disregard for the law), the Council, lead by Christine Quinn, was right to be wary of swearing him in immediaetly. But to hold off swearing in Vincent Ignizio until the questions about Eugene’s residency were resolved was absurd. There is no question of Ignizio’s residency: he did, after all, win two races for an overlapping Assembly district, and no one pretends that any substantive reason kept him from taking his rightful seat in City Hall.

Though Ignizio missed a few weeks of paychecks, those really set to suffer are the residents of his new Council district—especially those who also live in his former Assembly district, who were without a voice in two chambers which supposedly represent them. Elected leaders in surrounding areas and adjoining districts suffered unjustly as well, forced to pick up the slack in constituent services and legislation in the interim. With city and state budgets being in process, this problem was of special concern.

Saying this does not matter is really saying that the city’s government structure is redundant enough to absorb any problems caused by the absence of two elected officials from the same area. If that is true, maybe this controversy has revealed just how much fat could be trimmed from the ranks of elected officials who vote themselves pay raises. If, on the other hand, Ignizio was kept from office because of the Council’s nervous prevarication about holding everyone up to the same standard, we should all be questioning the sensibility of both the leadership and those who back them.